Rationale ontologists of education

Abstract

The relevance of the ontology of education is determined by the need to clarify the dependencies of human existence. It is the formation of his being, on the basis of the implementation of the first causes and grounds, the formation of values, goals and means, the commission of actions and actions. Its study is based on the achievements of metaphysics throughout its development. Accordingly, Aristotelian metaphysics as a doctrine of the first principles and causes, but already those that determine the existence of man. Kant’s metaphysics, which involves finding out the basics of cognition, but not a priori, but an a priori moment. Metaphysics as a proper ethics, in which the conditionality of the attribution of the grounds of existence is determined. The unity of Aristotelian and Kantian metaphysics in the ontology of education implies the merger of the problems of ontology and epistemology. Since the ontology of education is an ontology of existence, it uses the interpretation of the existence of existentialism. At the same time, it presupposes the presence of the subject, in this case, the upbringing - the pet. A mentor forms a pupil with a certain ontology, the originality of which determines the nature of its existence.

Ontology of education is the realization of the grounds for the subject’s existence in educational and social practice. The reasons are the position of one or another ethical theory, the adoption of which determines the state of consciousness, respectively, behavior. The concrete ontology of education allows the simultaneous use of the theoretical positions of several ethical systems. This is necessary to eliminate the disadvantages that may occur. Acceptance of the grounds is done by assigning their value, therefore the originality of the ontology is accomplished by forming value preferences. The bases of existence determine the goals of the subject, respectively, the way of thinking, actions and actions. Therefore, the consideration of ontology can reveal the teleology of the subject, in other words, the presence of causal relationships in the implementation of deeds.